47 Comments

thank you again Aussie

our team work with Kevin McKernan and David Speicher and others on this DNA contamination disaster, on the legal fronts

we have Federal Court proceedings afoot against Pfizer and Moderna:

https://amps.redunion.com.au/australian-court-covid19-drugs-gmo-pfizer-moderna-law

https://www.givesendgo.com/GAVAZ

we presented a brief of evidence to Australia's Attorney-General (AG):

https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/australian-criminal-brief-update

we presented an updated brief of evidence to Australia's Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP):

https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/australias-chief-criminal-prosecutor

we are waiting on a summary decision in the Federal Court proceedings

the AG refused to respond

the CDPP are ducking and weaving and tried to flick the brief of evidence back at us saying it contains a technical legal error with respect to the admissibility of some point of the evidence .. when know the CDPP is not acting in good faith because they did not have the courtesy to point out what the issue is .. we are presently revising the brief with assistance from a senior criminal lawyer

all in all Australian authorities are on the run because this comes back to the door of the Australian government .. that means legal liability .. that means big dollars in payouts

they knew Pfizer and Moderna are both GMOs, but ushered them in the side door hoping no one would realise

well, we did .. then the Gene Technology Regulator Dr Raj Bhula admitted they are GMOs last October .. so they are all running for cover now

same deal in the UK .. legally GMOs, but they did not tell the public

same deal in Europe .. legally GMOs but they intentionally ignored their GMO laws there, as had they observed the proper process, everyone in late 2020 would have been entitled to make Public Submissions about the potential dangers of these (LNP-modRNA) GMOs before the drugs could be approved, and the EMA wanted to avoid the public knowing these things are GMOs .. why? .. they will tell you there was an emergency and they wanted to avoid 'vaccine hesitancy'

but these things are not vaccines .. they are gene therapy GMOs .. that is what they really did not want the public to know, because the public would have properly told regulators and governments to get f*cked

on the EU laws read my paper here:

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/83

on the UK GMO laws we provided last year Andrew Bridgen MP with a full legal opinion .. he has acknowledged receipt, but to date has chosen not to inform the UK public

now we have the DNA contamination .. as the information links above also show, this DNA contamination is another form of GMO, and a form of GMO that would never have been approved by any jurisdiction because of the LNP component ensuring delivery into cells

we are looking at .. no, we are right in the midst of a global cluster f*ck by regulators

but let us be clear .. Moderna and Pfizer have always known about their products being GMOs, and especially about the DNA contamination

Moderna's own CEO expressed as much in this patent, which means Pfizer knew too, as they both closely read each others patents:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US10077439B2/en

to quote a section:

'Quantitative PCR is often applied to measure the residual DNA but it only detects the DNA molecules that contain both qPCR primers thus does not measure all other smaller DNA molecules that are partially digested. To overcome this challenge, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) approach can be used where a total nuclease digestion is performed on the RNA drug substance sample following the DNA removal step. The presence of individual residual deoxynucleotides is quantitatively assayed against deoxynucleotide standards using MS/MS and the abundance is reported.'

with the above patent floating around since 2014, at law, the information and knowledge expressed in that patent is assumed to be possessed and known by our regulatory 'experts'

plenty of those clowns have plenty of explaining to do .. the questions will not be nice .. the outcomes less so

.. and then there are the millions if not billions of contaminated humans

the genome of humanity has been poisoned irreversibly .. let that sink in

Expand full comment
author

thank you for doing the heavy lifting!

Expand full comment
Jan 20Liked by Aussie17

Julian, thanks for the info. Eventually, legal action will prevail, but it's gonna take lots of effort. Is there a way for folks to help fund your work? I would love to contribute. Thanks.

Expand full comment

You're not on the beach, you're presiding the ivory-tower !!

👍👏💪!!

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Aussie17

Does this not publicly verify that the ‘vaccines’ are GMO’s and should have been assessed as such in Australia?

Expand full comment

I think saying they should be assessed for genotoxicity is irrelevant because it's a bit like saying a Nigerian Prince fraudster should verify their business certificates before sending out scam emails claiming to have gold.

Pfizer have murdered these folks, and the government let them get away with it, knowingly.

Expand full comment

No, the DoD/Govt./HHS/Public Health murdered folks and they used Pfizer/Pharma as contractors to produce the weapons.

Expand full comment

You must work for Pfizer if you think I'm ever going to believe the very people who bribed congress into giving them immunity to liability were just some "hapless contractors".

Pfizer knew and are just as guilty. No downplaying accepted here.

Expand full comment

I'm not downplaying this genocide at all and I'm not working for pharma and I agree pharma is guilty, but they did not order this mass murder. The DoD/HHS/WHO ordered their contractors Pfizer/Moderna/J&J/AstraZeneca to produce the weapons, just like they ordered Gilead to produce the lethal Remdesivir and just like the PREP Act turned health care workers into murderers. http: //bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/on-civil-suits-against-pfizer-for

Expand full comment

"I agree pharma is guilty, but they did not order this mass murder."

It is either one or the other. I will not accept your downplaying in this.

I hold pharmaceutical companies guilty. Government isn't smart enough to run a road system, let alone design a bioweapon of this magnitude.

Expand full comment
Jan 20·edited Jan 21Liked by Aussie17

Both parties are guilty. The governments globally for ordering Pharma to develop the thing in too short a time frame. Pharma for complying and why wouldn't they because they are a for profit. The guilt of the damage lies with both parties for mandating the jabs when both parties were aware of the risk and the fact that trials had not been sufficient and pharma had actually obfuscated some of the dangers in the documentation they had to be coerced to hand over. Its not one of the other at all. Every entity involved has equal responsibility for the outcome.

Expand full comment

I think ‘irrelevant’ is a bit strong. Isn’t failure to assess genotoxicity the mechanism of the apparent fact that the government “let them get away with it”?

Expand full comment

You presume government testing has any validity.

So what if they forge the results the same way they did the so-called 'safety testing' that told you it was 'safe and effective'? The government is self-certifying. Their tests are irrelevant. They're criminal.

Expand full comment

In Australia I don’t think they did do any testing and of course I do not assume that their testing was/would be valid. I think (I’m not sure) they accepted the advice of either the manufacturers or external bodies (such as the CDC in the USA) or both. Neither of these are ‘independent’ advice. My comment was that such advice should routinely be obtained. From whom? I don’t know - it’s not my field - but I think the onus of proof of national bodies like the TGA falls on them to justify any claims that their advice is independent of vested interests.

Expand full comment

Oh, I agree, they should be independent.

The problem is, they're not. The EMA leaks showed us Pfizer could give bad data with numerous red flags, and if Pfizer lied to the EMA and said it was okay - with no evidence - the EMA parroted their lie. There's no testing, in the words of Dr John Campbell before he flipped sides: "we've only gone by the press release!" [regarding Pfizer's shot being given EUA in the UK].

So calling for testing when they're playing a game of crook is like asking a robber to reveal he has a compliant firearm before he robs a place.

These departments are not fit for purpose, the people who oversaw them must be prosecuted (or they will see it as a greenlight to commit even *worse* crimes against humanity), and a complete and total overhaul of how medical devices and medicines gets approved such it cannot be gamed needs to be developed to take the place.

I would say much the same of pharmaceutical companies as well.

Expand full comment

I agree.

Expand full comment

Quote from mirage news : TGA : Australia had the highest proportion of budget from industry fees (96%) and in 2020-2021 approved more than nine of every 10 drug company applications.

Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) firmly denies that its almost exclusive reliance on pharmaceutical industry funding is a conflict of interest (COI). But in Australia, experts have called for a complete overhaul of the TGA's structure and function, arguing that the agency has become too close to industry.

Expand full comment

Indeed. (In fact the figure I have seen quoted elsewhere is 97% …). Clearly unacceptable. The industry funding should be used instead to help pay for adverse reactions to pharmaceutical products and the agency funded entirely by public funds. (We don’t fund the AEC via fees from political parties, as a comparison.) Of course, obtaining genuinely independent appraisals depends on there being competent, yet unconflicted, people and agencies willing and able to do so; given the infiltration of Pharma funding into the industry, including (or perhaps even especially) universities, this may not be possible. Anyone competent may already have been bought out … A 9/10 approval rate for what have clearly been dodgy products ought be proof enough of the problem. Indeed, any failures at all ought be proof of the problem. (Remembering the ‘safe and effective’ AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ for which creators were lauded and celebrated, but which has now been withdrawn, as a recent spectacular example.)

Expand full comment
Jan 20·edited Jan 20

The government in Australia is responsible for assessing the product using the manufacturers testing and documentation and confirming the ingredients contained in the bottle are what they say and in the correct amounts. This is done at their laboratory in Armidale NSW. Most medications are now released with a "Subject to ongoing evaluation" on TGA approval notices. The COVID vaccines were tested here in the phase 3 global trial as I understand it. They are still only provisional approved and subject to "Ongoing evaluation" and will most likely remain so as the formula is changed every time they claim a new variant.

Expand full comment

On top of my prior list, you can also tack in:

Vaccine manufacturers offer revolving door jobs to the people who approve their product (Scott Gottlieb, Pfizer Board of Directors; Stephen Hahn, Flagship Pioneering, parent investment company of Moderna; Rishi Sunak, Theleme Partners, parent investment company of Moderna; Donald Trump, Johnson & Johnson stocks and shares; Dr Peter Hotez, selling his SC2 shots in India; Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, NIH-Moderna patents). You get the idea.

Expand full comment

Yes but, they don't want to deal with that, as it's the only one that has any legal potential, so they will ignore that and trickle feed (aka soften the news) to the public with an emphasis on GMP angle, making it a company issue, with inbuilt excuse for liability- "operation warp speed" + "mistakes were made"

= "we flew before building The plane" so not our fault, ad nauseam infinity.🤔😐🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️💩

Expand full comment

No doubt, but none of these arguments for the popular media ought hold water in a legal assessment of the TGA’s (mis)handling of its responsibilities, by assuming that information provided by manufacturers or external bodies does not require independent verification.

Expand full comment

And it wont, eventually. Its taken 60 years for thalidomide misconduct by regulatory bodies to be held up for account- and we still dont see any repercussions. So yeah the current crew will retire publically with a tiny bit of egg on their faces, but power loves a vacuum and a new lot that have been trained by the establishment will take their place. Same same but different. And t he public won't care because most of them are just trying to get through their day. "Quiet lives of desperation" and all that good quote.

🤷‍♀️😤😤🤐😭

Expand full comment

"For those who are vaccinated, I would now be relaxed."

Now or not? If he means 'now', no, they shouldn't be. They should be livid they were lied to in a massive conspiracy involving corporations and governments. The fact small time, independent labs have to raise the alarm whilst governments knowingly cover it up and corporations knowingly propagate it is absolutely criminal.

Expand full comment
author

It's necessary to say that otherwise it won't be aired. lol

Expand full comment

It wasn't aired anyway, it got taken down.

We should never capitulate to their demands or work for them.

Expand full comment

But not on TV, which was my main point.

They censored themselves for primetime TV only to get deplatformed anyway.

Scientists need to stop conforming their conclusions with the expectations of censors in order to 'limbo under' the restrictions. It's malpractice scientifically. Boycott the platforms that cannot tolerate honest discourse.

Expand full comment

I agree 100%. Thanks for the clarification.

Expand full comment

But after saying “relax”, he says “we don’t know if there will be any consequences in the next decades”.

“DON’T PANIC”

“OKAY PANIC!”

https://youtu.be/rQdxP2m79n8?si=AmPEjl43Zsdb38YQ

Expand full comment
Jan 20Liked by Aussie17

Finally some common sense appears in the echo chamber of the Internet.

"May potentially integrate into human DNA"."........ because we simply do not know." That word "may" and the last line is spot on. "We simply do not know" take note those who think the integration into DNA is a done deal. Its not and will not be until appropriate research by those who practice "Science" not "antiscienceism" do that and prove it is the case. Good work as usual mate.

Expand full comment

Aussie, thank you for another great article. Our USA mainstream media doesn't cover the Plandemic/Jibby Jab subject, so it's encouraging that more folks are willing to speak up publicly.

Expand full comment

This DNA contamination is mentioned frequently, but no one ever talks about what the potential health impacts are. What are they?

It's implied here the DNA degrades over time in the vaccinated. What does that mean exactly? Can it be passed down to next generation?

Expand full comment

read this PhD in molecular biology, Dr Hiroshi Arakawa .. you will need Chrome to translate from Japanese

TLDR: yes, it can and does get passed to the next generation, if they survive

https://note.com/hiroshi_arakawa/n/n4262516b8b32?magazine_key=m57ee2fec0b39

Expand full comment

If I understand right he's saying the next generation could express spike protein forever

Expand full comment

one real possibility, yes

Expand full comment

The DoD did this! Pharma willingly participated in all of it but our government led the way. That is why it will be so difficult to hold anyone accountable. No one in government is ever held accountable for anything.

Expand full comment

Event 201 continues, as planned...

( the resolution must be televised )

Expand full comment

Time to look at the big picture. Which companies are the biggest shareholders in almost every major corporation in the world? Which companies profit from endless wars? Which companies promote divisive issues, globally? Which companies have the wealth to crash the global economy? Blackrock and Vanguard. Combine these companies with the rest of the world's wealthy elite and the answers become obvious. Not a conspiracy theory, just a conspiracy.

Expand full comment

Three guesses as to who is a major funder of the TGA.

Expand full comment

Take note that there's not one mention in this news report re. how the lipid nanoparticles breach the cell membrane taking the DNA into the cell or about the SV40 promoter & it's primary purpose ... to target the nucleus.

https://www.nature.com/articles/3300924

Expand full comment

.

When Each One Dies

So Too Does A Piece Of The Bullshit

They All Believed.

.

Expand full comment

Thanks Aussie

Added it in to the growing list of 'what the heck is in these shots'

https://totalityofevidence.com/what-is-in-the-covid-19-vaccines/

Expand full comment

And this how you make zombies..... ffs.... wtf do we even do at this point? This is so horrifying.

Expand full comment

As I understand now, even though I'm UnVaXXed & haven't "had" the refined bioweapon injected, it is very, very likely that I would test positive to SPIKE PROTEIN. That the Sheeple took the bait then went home & shedded on The Innocent. That The World's humans are ALL compromised. I honestly wonder, have we been killed and we wait to drop? We should kill every billionaire on the planet, before Humanity dies out. FINAL VENGEANCE.

Expand full comment