From a broad systems science, perspective, this development falls under what is generically termed as "emergence" or "emergent risks". These can only be detected after years of research and testing. But didnt the powers that be (TPTB) confer a Nobel Prize to the developers of the mRNA vaccine? Just shows you what kind of anti-human agenda is at play here.
This has never been about science or the pursuit of truth and health. This has always been about the pursuit of intellectual property rights and the erosion of civil rights in order to consolidate power and wealth. The pretext of science is just a masquerade. Whether this is by grand design by powerful elites or merely the inevitable result of humanity's depravity, I don't know.
All of the unmasking that is occurring since Covid is sadly necessary for the truth to emerge. The question is how many scientific studies are necessary to wake up Academia? How many deaths do doctors need to witness to notice correlation? How many civil liberties must be taken away for people to notice the pattern? How much censorship can be tolerated in a constitutional republic before it breaks apart?
I don't know the answers. l only know we're at the beginning of whatever is to come. I'm pretty sure we haven't gotten to the bad part yet.
I wrote previously in Igor’s stack that this is not a surprise at all. mRNA jabs were a disaster from day one when they were introduced for cancer treatment and surprise!!! Tumors grew faster. So much for explaining increased Zolodex demand for an epidemic of cancers. Would also explain the neurodegenerative symptoms seen in people as garbage piles up in the brain. As they say, garbage in, garbage out.
I think its 1 out of 4 people (to be exact 5 out of 21). Figure 2d shows elevated SFU on 5 subjects our of 21 Pfizer jabbed (If I read it correctly...)
1960s (?) - work initiated on modifying the building blocks of human life - without any understanding of what it is
1970s (?) - work continued, the absence of understanding replaced with ad hoc local limited results produced in isolated systems
1980s (?) - the paradigm of worldwide economy changed to mass manufacturing of short-life, preprogrammed obsoleting products
1990s (?) - the peak of “gain of function” (= intervening in a live organism with the intention to disrupt its natural, spontaneous, healthy functioning) research
2020 spring - voices around the world started to shout “vax bad, vax dangerous, mask wrong, pcr fake, distancing stupid, lockdown unscientific” and more
2023 winter - a “discovery” that destroying the original, natural structure of a live organism causes its decomposition
Viewed from the hill, it looks like we (the human combined mental capacity) haven’t lost our mind - we have never developed it. First, we select and highly pay a bunch of “scientists” who have no basic understanding of life (and will never have due to the limitations of science).
We then deliberately unbalance, make ill or destroy the living human being by contaminating the natural environment of life with substances and technologies whose long-term impact is not and cannot be examined in sufficient detail to decide whether they are life-supportive. Except that we quickly and readily conclude all harmful effects of these substances - but this does not make us stop and think for a second.
Then we allow the same scientists to develop more artificial substances to handle the problems created by them a while ago.
One day, suddenly, we wake up to the enlightening conclusion that the same scientists have managed to infect the whole Earth with a substance that basically will make every body to turn into a pack of a dysfunctional, deregulated, defective systems beyond the point or repair.
2024 and on - the same scientists happily continue their work on further destroying the whole human species - still having not even an approximation of understanding on how life processes work.
If you mess with nature, nature messes with you. And the belief in science and materialism, that they can fix everything is the height of hubris. And as lovers of the classics, now, after hubris comes nemesis.
Even better, the authors of the study state that it is not the jab that is the problem, but that the body doesn't handle it right.
I swore the house down when I read that*
"More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found."
*My wife and I are both unjabbed, and neither got Covid. A cold my wife got around Omicron time tested positive, but that a) is meaningless & b) had there been no Covid it would have just been a cold. We did both however contract appalling cases of Tourettes, which neither of us have been able to shake off.
I thought I/we were going to read something we didn't know. Not a problem. I published the 1st article over a year and a half ago on the N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine effect. And am disappointed your article did not present the post translation impact of said.
To boot, when Daszak and Baric were concentrating on shifting ORF frames a couple of years ago (public knowledge), it is a shame nobody considered the why and therefore.
I think its 1 out of 4 people (to be exact 5 out of 21). Figure 2d shows elevated SFU on 5 subjects our of 21 Pfizer jabbed (If I read it correctly...)
Here I describe how I know that these injections were designed intentionally to cause harm, to kill & to reduce fertility.
I wasn’t aware of this additional source of potential toxicity.
https://rumble.com/v3zywlj-the-saborski-address-english.html
From a broad systems science, perspective, this development falls under what is generically termed as "emergence" or "emergent risks". These can only be detected after years of research and testing. But didnt the powers that be (TPTB) confer a Nobel Prize to the developers of the mRNA vaccine? Just shows you what kind of anti-human agenda is at play here.
NO to hidden biochemical warfare labs.
NO fancy arsed euphemisms FOR "biochemical warfare"
We must commit to a BAN on ALL mRNA jabs - cease & desisit NOW!
This has never been about science or the pursuit of truth and health. This has always been about the pursuit of intellectual property rights and the erosion of civil rights in order to consolidate power and wealth. The pretext of science is just a masquerade. Whether this is by grand design by powerful elites or merely the inevitable result of humanity's depravity, I don't know.
All of the unmasking that is occurring since Covid is sadly necessary for the truth to emerge. The question is how many scientific studies are necessary to wake up Academia? How many deaths do doctors need to witness to notice correlation? How many civil liberties must be taken away for people to notice the pattern? How much censorship can be tolerated in a constitutional republic before it breaks apart?
I don't know the answers. l only know we're at the beginning of whatever is to come. I'm pretty sure we haven't gotten to the bad part yet.
I wrote previously in Igor’s stack that this is not a surprise at all. mRNA jabs were a disaster from day one when they were introduced for cancer treatment and surprise!!! Tumors grew faster. So much for explaining increased Zolodex demand for an epidemic of cancers. Would also explain the neurodegenerative symptoms seen in people as garbage piles up in the brain. As they say, garbage in, garbage out.
We keep seeing all these malfeasance and yet no one has made big pharma accountable. We are really in a scary movie that never end..
Not sure if it was one in four people or one in four cells?
I think its 1 out of 4 people (to be exact 5 out of 21). Figure 2d shows elevated SFU on 5 subjects our of 21 Pfizer jabbed (If I read it correctly...)
Timeline:
1960s (?) - work initiated on modifying the building blocks of human life - without any understanding of what it is
1970s (?) - work continued, the absence of understanding replaced with ad hoc local limited results produced in isolated systems
1980s (?) - the paradigm of worldwide economy changed to mass manufacturing of short-life, preprogrammed obsoleting products
1990s (?) - the peak of “gain of function” (= intervening in a live organism with the intention to disrupt its natural, spontaneous, healthy functioning) research
2020 spring - voices around the world started to shout “vax bad, vax dangerous, mask wrong, pcr fake, distancing stupid, lockdown unscientific” and more
2023 winter - a “discovery” that destroying the original, natural structure of a live organism causes its decomposition
Viewed from the hill, it looks like we (the human combined mental capacity) haven’t lost our mind - we have never developed it. First, we select and highly pay a bunch of “scientists” who have no basic understanding of life (and will never have due to the limitations of science).
We then deliberately unbalance, make ill or destroy the living human being by contaminating the natural environment of life with substances and technologies whose long-term impact is not and cannot be examined in sufficient detail to decide whether they are life-supportive. Except that we quickly and readily conclude all harmful effects of these substances - but this does not make us stop and think for a second.
Then we allow the same scientists to develop more artificial substances to handle the problems created by them a while ago.
One day, suddenly, we wake up to the enlightening conclusion that the same scientists have managed to infect the whole Earth with a substance that basically will make every body to turn into a pack of a dysfunctional, deregulated, defective systems beyond the point or repair.
2024 and on - the same scientists happily continue their work on further destroying the whole human species - still having not even an approximation of understanding on how life processes work.
If you mess with nature, nature messes with you. And the belief in science and materialism, that they can fix everything is the height of hubris. And as lovers of the classics, now, after hubris comes nemesis.
You are the man when it comes to layman-izing pharmaspeak. Thanks for the breakdown.
Even better, the authors of the study state that it is not the jab that is the problem, but that the body doesn't handle it right.
I swore the house down when I read that*
"More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/12/06/mrna-jabs-modena-pfizer-quarter-unintended-response/
*My wife and I are both unjabbed, and neither got Covid. A cold my wife got around Omicron time tested positive, but that a) is meaningless & b) had there been no Covid it would have just been a cold. We did both however contract appalling cases of Tourettes, which neither of us have been able to shake off.
Poisoned. There is no immune system for there’s nothing to be immune from
I thought I/we were going to read something we didn't know. Not a problem. I published the 1st article over a year and a half ago on the N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine effect. And am disappointed your article did not present the post translation impact of said.
To boot, when Daszak and Baric were concentrating on shifting ORF frames a couple of years ago (public knowledge), it is a shame nobody considered the why and therefore.
We shall persevere.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/shocking-report-us-government-data?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/ribosomal-frameshifting-misreading-of-mrna-in-covid-19-vaccines-leads-to-off-target-proteins-immune-responses-eliciting-safety-concerns-41ef2bcb
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/landmark-paper-shows-pfizerbiontechs-mrna-tech-is-error-prone-1d035f71
I think its 1 out of 4 people (to be exact 5 out of 21). Figure 2d shows elevated SFU on 5 subjects our of 21 Pfizer jabbed (If I read it correctly...)