“…from the beginning, I thought this was a lie. It's almost been three years, but the aspects of lying just keep appearing. We are practically being deceived, lied to...”
Another Emeritus Professor giving a perspective based on an extensive career. As they have ‘retired’, their livelihood and/or their research funding are not threatened by speaking out. (At least not directly) and nor is their institution threatened. So they have little to lose by being honest and giving frank opinions. The risks of speaking out for active professionals, on the other hand, are huge. This continues to be a major problem, andyy my inclination is to listen to those with nothing to lose (or gain) by being honest with their scientific opinions. Contrariwise, much more care is needed to listen to those whose livelihoods, careers and funding depends on their saying what their sponsors (or employers) want them to say.
(Assuming of course that Emeritus positions in Korea are mostly like those elsewhere.)
These doctors and other SME's who have allowed themselves to be kowtowed and subjugated by their authorising bodies such as APHRA in Australia with the support of the government need to first of all grow a backbone. Second, they need to understand what they are not taught, there is strength in numbers, taking a lesson from the activist unions would not harm them. But they must be willing to make sacrifices, including time off and pay losses for the long term gain. Instead of allowing APHRA to dictate to them, they should form their own association and register it. then go after APHRA, govt and pharma, when it goes after their own. Thousands of doctors being given that voice will soon win over the public as they will no longer have to fear APHRA who will learn they now have to fight properly to attack a health professional not just send a letter saying they are de registered. Strength in numbers.
Yea but it comes down to whether they did what they are supposed to when the APHRA and government stomped on the doctors for questioning and acting against the narrative they were driving. I am not aware they defended any of the deregistered practitioners nor came to the defence of them.
“…they need to understand what they are not taught”.
I think that SD is right on target on this, as the ingrained training is probably 70% of the problem with doctors. For the best part of a century the whole medical education & training system has been built on a raft of assumptions that ‘vaccination’ is rolled-gold science and therefore can never be challenged. For this reason, the overwhelming majority of doctors will psychologically reject instantly any suggestion by anyone that the science of the vaccination platform is deeply flawed and often dangerous. To most GPs it would be like answering a knock at the front door of their home to find somebody from the Calathumpian Church standing there clutching a bible in one hand and flyers in the other, insisting that the Calathumpian religious belief system is the only true one and that the householder must convert to be saved. What would our good doctor say to such a person? Answer - the same as most other people – “buggar off”! The psychological leap for a doctor to dump belief in such a key part of the medical system as routine vaccination is simply far too great for most doctors to make.
The only thing that would gain traction is success in legal action against a medical practitioner for inflicting damage on a patient – however don’t hold your breath waiting for the Australian legal system to put this into effect. The way the system works in Australia is that judges are only swayed by the evidence provided by ‘expert witnesses’ - and guess which corporations have bottomless pockets to ensure that an army of ‘expert witnesses’ can be found and wheeled into court to shoot down any suggestion that their pharmaceutical product might be dangerous to the population at large.
meanwhile many of the unjabbed have lost everything, many of the jabbed are dead and many are sick and there is nothing to stop it from happening again...So to all the gutless. selfish quacks, politicians, judges and scientists and academics and potential government whistleblowers who have no morals. ethics, compassion or basic humanity you all need to have a big think. I am not sure this is going to play out the way you want. Everyone one of you wants it to all go away, but it does not seem to be going anywhere.
Thank you so much for providing all this information, to include the incredible translation work you do! I have learned a great deal from reading your substack: things I simply would not have otherwise heard about! I so appreciate your work! Jill
Another good read and find in terms of the video. Cheers mate. Folks if you have not subbed to Aussie, consider it even if its just for a couple of months, even a short sub is better than nothing and helps keep the information flowing.
Another Emeritus Professor giving a perspective based on an extensive career. As they have ‘retired’, their livelihood and/or their research funding are not threatened by speaking out. (At least not directly) and nor is their institution threatened. So they have little to lose by being honest and giving frank opinions. The risks of speaking out for active professionals, on the other hand, are huge. This continues to be a major problem, andyy my inclination is to listen to those with nothing to lose (or gain) by being honest with their scientific opinions. Contrariwise, much more care is needed to listen to those whose livelihoods, careers and funding depends on their saying what their sponsors (or employers) want them to say.
(Assuming of course that Emeritus positions in Korea are mostly like those elsewhere.)
These doctors and other SME's who have allowed themselves to be kowtowed and subjugated by their authorising bodies such as APHRA in Australia with the support of the government need to first of all grow a backbone. Second, they need to understand what they are not taught, there is strength in numbers, taking a lesson from the activist unions would not harm them. But they must be willing to make sacrifices, including time off and pay losses for the long term gain. Instead of allowing APHRA to dictate to them, they should form their own association and register it. then go after APHRA, govt and pharma, when it goes after their own. Thousands of doctors being given that voice will soon win over the public as they will no longer have to fear APHRA who will learn they now have to fight properly to attack a health professional not just send a letter saying they are de registered. Strength in numbers.
Does the AMPS meet this need to some extent? I’m not sure, as I’m not a medico. Maybe others can comment: https://amps.redunion.com.au/
Yea but it comes down to whether they did what they are supposed to when the APHRA and government stomped on the doctors for questioning and acting against the narrative they were driving. I am not aware they defended any of the deregistered practitioners nor came to the defence of them.
Quoting SD:
“…they need to understand what they are not taught”.
I think that SD is right on target on this, as the ingrained training is probably 70% of the problem with doctors. For the best part of a century the whole medical education & training system has been built on a raft of assumptions that ‘vaccination’ is rolled-gold science and therefore can never be challenged. For this reason, the overwhelming majority of doctors will psychologically reject instantly any suggestion by anyone that the science of the vaccination platform is deeply flawed and often dangerous. To most GPs it would be like answering a knock at the front door of their home to find somebody from the Calathumpian Church standing there clutching a bible in one hand and flyers in the other, insisting that the Calathumpian religious belief system is the only true one and that the householder must convert to be saved. What would our good doctor say to such a person? Answer - the same as most other people – “buggar off”! The psychological leap for a doctor to dump belief in such a key part of the medical system as routine vaccination is simply far too great for most doctors to make.
The only thing that would gain traction is success in legal action against a medical practitioner for inflicting damage on a patient – however don’t hold your breath waiting for the Australian legal system to put this into effect. The way the system works in Australia is that judges are only swayed by the evidence provided by ‘expert witnesses’ - and guess which corporations have bottomless pockets to ensure that an army of ‘expert witnesses’ can be found and wheeled into court to shoot down any suggestion that their pharmaceutical product might be dangerous to the population at large.
Follow the money, into full-blown deception after giving the Hippocratic oath.
Quite a kind of bastards ...
meanwhile many of the unjabbed have lost everything, many of the jabbed are dead and many are sick and there is nothing to stop it from happening again...So to all the gutless. selfish quacks, politicians, judges and scientists and academics and potential government whistleblowers who have no morals. ethics, compassion or basic humanity you all need to have a big think. I am not sure this is going to play out the way you want. Everyone one of you wants it to all go away, but it does not seem to be going anywhere.
Thanks.... it is still such a challenge to get our friends and family to listen... the god of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers..
Stockholm syndrome, the population is invested in maintaining belief in a corrupt system because the alternative requires great work and risk.
Then change the approach if what you are doing is not working.
Yes...
Thank you so much for providing all this information, to include the incredible translation work you do! I have learned a great deal from reading your substack: things I simply would not have otherwise heard about! I so appreciate your work! Jill
Another good read and find in terms of the video. Cheers mate. Folks if you have not subbed to Aussie, consider it even if its just for a couple of months, even a short sub is better than nothing and helps keep the information flowing.
Thank you so much for sharing everything you do!