Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I’m glad this professor is speaking plainly about the mRNA based injections, but I’m concerned he’s (presumably) inadvertently reinforcing certain points in the official narrative that are highly questionable or untrue.

There has not been a pandemic of acute respiratory illness & death. Whatever has happened, this isn’t it.

Personally, I’m of the view that there wasn’t a new pathogen, either.

Those who dismiss Denis Rancourt’s findings (that all causes mortality did not increase anywhere until the WHO called a pandemic and novel medical protocols were instigated everywhere) mostly aren’t biologists.

I’ve been told “there might not have been a spike in deaths prior to WHO’s pronouncement, but people in quantity were definitely getting ill, far more than usual”.

I don’t buy that. No data supports that. But the key point is that biology mostly acts in a continuum. If there had been a severe acute respiratory syndrome-causing pathogen circulating widely, associated with lots of people getting very ill, there would inevitably be an increase in deaths, in the elderly and frail.

Given this latter didn’t happen & deaths only spiked after the WHO declaration, I struggle to fit a real, transmissible entity moving through population.

Note also the diagnostic PCR-based test was deliberately designed to read positive even when there was nothing out of place in the sample (see the Corman-Drosten Review). That’s consistent with the perpetrators knowing full well there wasn’t a pandemic or pathogen.

The entire event is an extensively rehearsed fraud (see Paul Schreyer’s YouTube documentary called “Pandemic Simulations: preparation for a new era?”).

Had there been a real, novel pathogen, natural or lab made, there could have been & would have been a wide range of outcomes. In some places, the event would have burned out. In others, it might have turned out to be more lethal than expected. Almost everywhere, their t would sweep through the population in a few weeks & not return. Please don’t quote the 1918-19 Spanish flu pandemic. Most of that event, too, was faked.

The biggest risk we run is to permit the persistence of the “scary, lethal virus” lie.

It’s not correct & repeating it, unaware of or dismissive about posts like this, are honestly painting humanity into a corner, and helping the lie to be reused. Listen to Jonathan Engler’s recent interview with Dr Ahmad Malik. Jonathan fully “gets it”.

Because there never was a novel viral pandemic, and even if there had been, developing a vaccine in order to terminate such an event, would never have been a reasonable response.

Firstly, it takes far longer to do even a perfunctory job of demonstrating safety and efficacy let alone mass manufacturing of billions of doses, that any duration of a real pandemic (if such are even possible, immunologically, which I now doubt). But this fact alone tells you what they were doing is fraud.

Secondly, most people were never vulnerable to this alleged virus. So why jab them?

You’d never jab the recovered, the pregnant and children. Yet they were all mowed down.

A final point is that this fellow claims that vaccine escape mutants might escape immunity and spread it, without noticing it themselves. That implies asymptomatic transmission, which doesn’t happen.

Scarily, if you’re new to this, transmission has never been demonstrated, only inferred from the pattern of “cases”. Reading these papers kicked away the last pillar of the narrative about respiratory viruses as a category.

Expand full comment
Faith&FitnessMama's avatar

I have a stash of ivermectin as well as all the immune boosting supplements (quercetin, vitamins D & C, zinc, melatonin) just in case there’s a deadly variant that emerges or we have a real pandemic.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts