Have you ever wondered why most doctors walk along the same lines regarding the Covid mRNA vaccines, and very few doctors speak out against the narrative? We explain this behaviour in this chapter of PharmaFiles.
The first thing you need to know is “Clinical Practice Guidelines”. In the industry, we call them CPG. So, what are CPGs?
CPGs are guidelines that doctors refer to when treating any disease. There are guidelines for every illness, from hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, etc.
A select but anonymous group of doctors and experts usually writes the guidelines within a country for their respective specialty. For example, The Heart Foundation in Australia writes guidelines for cardiovascular-related diseases.
Here are examples of guidelines written by The Heart Foundation.
Within these documents, there is usually a section where they provide "Drug Choices". In this section, they will recommend the drugs according to specific algorithms such as the patient's age, whether they are obese, whether they have prior medical histories, etc.
We call these Drug Treatment Flowcharts. It is an algorithmic approach to the patient’s condition and the desired outcomes. In the example below, if a patient has hypertension, they will provide a starting dose of one drug. Then, they will give the patients a “two-drug combo” if they have more severe hypertension. Finally, if they can’t hit a desired blood pressure level, they will switch up some drugs and even add a “third drug combo”.
Now here is what we do in Pharma. Influencing Clinical Guidelines is very important in boosting drug sales. It is managed by specialized Pharma folks who usually get paid 3 or 4 times more than a usual Medical Sales Rep. These people are generally a select group from various departments specializing in their field.
Usually, their first job is to identify the committee of experts who influences these guidelines. The reason is that the anonymous committee of experts who write these guidelines are often an unknown group of doctors from their respective specialization.
Sometimes, Big Pharma employs private investigation agencies to identify who these experts are. They will find out everything from how frequently these committees meet, where they meet, their meeting schedules, frequency of meetings, member rotations etc.
Once we identify these doctors, we influence them through various means to ensure our drug lands as high as possible in the "Drug Choice" section of the Guidelines. When our drug land in the right place, the sales of that drug typically skyrocket by about a factor of 5x, 10x or more.
The reason is that the system is set up so that there is punitive damage for doctors who do not follow the guidelines without proper justification.
For example, a doctor who sees a patient with high blood pressure will immediately prescribe some antihypertensive drugs because of the guidelines.
The reason is this. If a doctor recommends something like, "Hey, why don't you try fasting and lose some weight first?" (a better treatment algorithm but not written within the guidelines), they risk losing their medical license.
If something happens to the patient after visiting the doctor who made the recommendation outside the guidelines, for example, if the patient gets a heart attack or death, the doctor can lose his medical license because the Medical Board will demand an explanation of why they did not follow the guidelines.
Ultimately, they are forced to follow the guidelines even if they disagree, and most do not dare to explore alternatives. Moreover, most doctors take the conservative approach because they fear losing their medical licenses. The medical license is the key to a doctor's livelihood, and the Medical Board has the authority to pull the licenses of doctors.
This is why you will never hear a doctor endorse or openly discuss alternatives, even if they are pretty knowledgeable about them. They risk losing their license and livelihood. They also risk litigations by unscrupulous patients who take advantage of these situations, especially in highly litigious countries like the USA.
In the case of the COVID mRNA experimental vaccine, this is precisely why many doctors follow "CDC Guidelines" promoted by Mr Fauci and the CDC, who pushed aggressively for the mRNA vaccinations. These doctors are afraid of losing their licenses and litigations, and rightly so because many who spoke up did lose their medical licenses.
The COVID mRNA vaccine experiment guidelines have even gone a step further. There did not create treatment algorithms for different demographics of the population. For example, the elderly population, who are more susceptible to death, should be differentiated from children with almost zero chance of dying from COVID.
It must be said that Anthony Fauci does not work alone, and many in the US influence the FDA guidelines. Many of them have been "influenced" by Pharma's narrative of the mRNA vaccine, such as Dr Oveta Fuller, who died shortly after taking the vaccine.
https://rumble.com/v215d9k-oveta-fuller-rip.html
There are many suitable alternative treatments for various diseases. But unfortunately, these treatments do not land in the guidelines because of the influence of the Pharma Industry.
For example, you will rarely find a ketogenic diet and fasting, which almost cures diabetes, hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases. Many doctors know, but few speak up.
Anyway, this is one of the core reasons why in the last three years, people have been wearing masks and maintaining 6 feet distancing and taking multiple mRNA shots, simply because Anthony Fauci and his gang put them in the Covid Guidelines.
This saddens me. We like to think our doctors are providing individualized medicine, when in fact they are merely following guidelines